Top RL EnvironmentsAn independent guide to RL environment vendors

The companies that build RL environments, compared

37 vendors that sell the tasks, sandboxes and verifiers labs use to train agents. Picked by what you are training, with every fact sourced.

  • ✓ 246 sources linked
  • ✓ Rankings are never sold
  • ✓ Reviewed November 9, 2026

Find a vendor

What are you training?

Our picks by use case

How we pick. No lab has publicly confirmed its vendors, so these rest on public evidence only.

1Platform or hub

Prime Intellect

The largest public catalog: 2,500+ community environments, plus hosted RL.

  • – Bespoke builds
  • ✓ Platform or hub
  • $130M Series A (Jul 2026); $150M+ total
Why we picked it

Prime Intellect has the largest public catalog we found, with 2,500+ community environments on its hub, plus the open-source verifiers library, the prime-rl trainer and hosted RL. Its $130M Series A is confirmed, and TechCrunch names Ramp and Zapier as customers. Hub environments are community-built and vary in quality, and it disclosed a sandbox escape affecting eval stacks in August 2026.

Also consider HUD, General Reasoning

See profileVisit site

2Self-serve and published pricing

HUD

The only public usage price we found: $0.10 per environment-hour.

  • – Bespoke builds
  • ✓ Platform or hub
  • $16M Series A (Jun 2026)
Why we picked it

HUD is the only vendor with a public usage price: $0.10 per environment-hour on its cloud, with a free SDK tier. The SDK is MIT-licensed, it hosts OSWorld-Verified, and its marketplace lets you buy environments from other vendors. Its SOC 2 claim has no published report, and marketplace environments need your own QA.

Also consider Prime Intellect

See profileVisit site

3Computer-use environments

Plato

Resettable simulated workplaces, and an open 300-world validation set.

  • – Bespoke builds
  • ✓ Platform or hub
  • $16M Series A (Oct 2026); $19M total
Why we picked it

Plato documents resettable simulated workplaces (a CRM, Git server, wiki and Ubuntu desktop) with scoring modes, and released Computer Work Val, a 300-world validation set, in October 2026 after a confirmed $16M Series A. The team is about 10 people with no named customers. Runner-up Scale AI publishes 1,000 computer-use tasks across Linux, Windows and macOS, but Meta owns about 49% of it.

Also consider Scale AI

See profileVisit site

4Coding and SWE environments

Datacurve

Its DeepSWE benchmark is open source and used by a third-party index.

  • ✓ Bespoke builds
  • – Platform or hub
  • $15M Series A (Oct 2025); $17.7M total
Why we picked it

Datacurve’s DeepSWE benchmark is open source (Apache-2.0) and is part of the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, which is rare third-party adoption. Proximal’s FrontierSWE runs 20-hour tasks, and Bespoke Labs contributes to Terminal-Bench 2.0. Datacurve’s headcount fell from about 36 to about 29 between June and October 2026, and Proximal’s $200M revenue claim is unverified.

Also consider Proximal, Bespoke Labs

See profileVisit site

5Enterprise app replicas

Turing

Interactive Jira, Salesforce and Zendesk replicas with expert-written policies.

  • – Bespoke builds
  • – Platform or hub
  • $111M Series E (Mar 2025); $225M total
Why we picked it

Turing’s product page names interactive replicas of Jira, Salesforce and Zendesk plus MCP backends with policies written by subject-matter experts, and Epoch AI names it among data providers selling environments. Mercor, through Deeptune, has built hundreds of Slack- and Salesforce-style gyms. Turing’s lab customer claims are self-reported, and Mercor carries a 2026 data breach and pending lawsuits.

Also consider Mercor, Deeptune

See profileVisit site

6Finance and knowledge-work environments

Halluminate

Finance diligence environments built from real private-deal data.

  • ✓ Bespoke builds
  • – Platform or hub
  • $30M Series A (Oct 2026); $38.5M total
Why we picked it

Halluminate builds finance diligence environments from anonymized data on real private transactions and has released open Westworld environments. Its $30M Series A (October 2026) is confirmed, and it reports being profitable. It says it works with four of the five top US closed labs without naming any, and one benchmark score differs between its blog and its press coverage.

See profileVisit site

7Security and cyber environments

Collinear

100+ runnable security environments; CWE-bench is in a public cyber index.

  • ✓ Bespoke builds
  • – Platform or hub
  • Funding not disclosed
Why we picked it

Collinear’s CWE-bench is included in the Artificial Analysis Cyber Index, and its Simulation Lab offers 100+ runnable environments and 4,000+ tasks. Its trust centre lists SOC 2 and ISO/IEC 42001. Its funding is reported only by an aggregator, and the CWE-bench eval set is private.

See profileVisit site

8Open standard

OpenEnv

An open BSD-3 standard from PyTorch and Hugging Face, run by a committee.

  • – Bespoke builds
  • ✓ Platform or hub
  • Funding not disclosed
Why we picked it

OpenEnv is a BSD-3 framework started by Meta’s PyTorch team and Hugging Face and now run by a multi-company technical committee, with 40+ environments and integrations for TRL, SkyRL and Unsloth. General Reasoning’s OpenReward is the vendor alternative, with 430+ hosted environments and the open Open Reward Standard protocol. OpenEnv’s APIs are still early, and General Reasoning also trains its own models.

Also consider General Reasoning

See profileVisit site

9Compliance-sensitive buyers

Snorkel AI

SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA listed, and it co-maintains Terminal-Bench.

  • ✓ Bespoke builds
  • – Platform or hub
  • $350M Series E (Sep 2026)
Why we picked it

Snorkel AI lists SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA, co-maintains Terminal-Bench and closed a confirmed $350M Series E in September 2026. Scale AI has FedRAMP High, and Huzzle Labs is the only small shop we found with a checkable SOC 2 trust centre. Snorkel’s lab ties come only from a logo wall, and Scale is about 49% owned by Meta.

Also consider Scale AI, Huzzle Labs

See profileVisit site

The market in four numbers

Full pricing guide

Typical price per task
$200 to $2,000
Epoch AI, Jan 2026
Typical contract per quarter
6 to 7 figures
Epoch AI, Jan 2026
Premium for exclusive environments
4 to 5x
Epoch AI, Jan 2026
Vendors selling environments
35+
SemiAnalysis, Jan 2026

All 37 vendors by environment type

A check means the vendor says it builds that type, with a source on its profile.

Vendors and the environment types they build. Funding as last reported.
VendorCoding and SWEComputer useApp replicasTool useReasoningDomain expertsFunding
Prime IntellectRuns the Environments Hub, open-source RL tooling and hosted RL training✓✓–✓✓–$130M Series A (Jul 2026); $150M+ total
HUDPlatform and marketplace for building, buying and running RL environments✓✓–✓––$16M Series A (Jun 2026)
General ReasoningHosts RL environments as API endpoints through OpenReward✓––✓✓✓$10.9M (SEC Form D, 2025)
Veris AISimulated copies of a company’s systems for testing and training enterprise agents✓–✓✓––$8.5M seed (Jun 2025)
VmaxGenerates new environments automatically from your data and evals✓––✓––Not disclosed
PlatoBuilds resettable simulated workplaces for computer-use agents–✓✓–––$16M Series A (Oct 2026); $19M total
HalluminateBuilds RL environments for finance and consulting knowledge work–✓–––✓$30M Series A (Oct 2026); $38.5M total
FleetBuilds simulated "training gyms" that replicate enterprise software–✓✓–––Not disclosed
Chakra LabsExpert-authored tasks and cloned enterprise apps for training and red-teaming–✓✓✓–✓Not disclosed
RefreshBuilds high-fidelity software clones, including EHR suites and Blender✓✓✓––✓Not disclosed
ThetaTurns real workspaces into custom simulation environments for agents✓–✓––✓Not disclosed
DatacurveBuilds coding and SWE environments with a bounty network of engineers✓––––✓$15M Series A (Oct 2025); $17.7M total
ProximalBuilds long-horizon coding environments and post-training data✓–––––$15M seed at $300M (Sep 2026)
AbundantBuilds coding environments and datasets for RL✓–––––Not disclosed
MechanizeBuilds environments and evals for coding agents (status changed, see watch-outs)✓–––––Not disclosed
Bespoke LabsBuilds company-scale simulations with real codebases and microservices✓––✓✓–$40M seed and Series A (Jul 2026)
AfterQueryExpert data company with custom agent environments across APIs and tools✓––✓–✓$30M Series A (Apr 2026)
IdlerBuilds RL environments from real production work✓–✓✓–✓$9M seed reported (Aug 2026), unconfirmed
Huzzle LabsBuilds coding, computer-use and enterprise-workflow environments✓✓✓–––$6M reported by directories
Preference ModelBuilds RL environments designed to resist reward hacking––––––$16M seed (Oct 2026, a16z)
CollinearSimulation Lab: off-the-shelf environments with tools, users and verifiers✓✓✓✓–✓Not disclosed
Good Start LabsGame environments with verifiable rewards, plus human gameplay data––––––$3.6M (Oct 2025)
TastePreference data and evaluation environments for design quality–––––✓$18.5M seed (Jun 2026)
AndromedeGenerates environments, tasks and verifiers programmatically from real data––––––Not disclosed
Scale AIData major selling enterprise and computer-use RL environments (Enterprise Atlas)✓✓✓✓––Meta bought a ~49% stake (Jun 2025)
Surge AIData major with off-the-shelf enterprise RL environments (EnterpriseBench)✓–✓✓–✓No outside funding disclosed (bootstrapped)
MercorExpert network that now owns Deeptune’s enterprise-app gyms✓–✓✓–✓$350M Series C at $10B (Oct 2025)
DeeptuneAcquired by Mercor (Jul 2026); built gyms that mimic Slack and Salesforce✓✓✓–––$43M Series A (Mar 2026, a16z)
TuringData major with UI clones of Jira, Salesforce and Zendesk plus MCP backends✓✓✓✓–✓$111M Series E (Mar 2025); $225M total
Handshake AIAI-data arm of Handshake; sells RL environments through Fireworks AI✓––✓–✓~$435M total (parent company)
Snorkel AIData major selling expert tasks, RL environments and the Terminal-Bench+ curriculum✓✓✓✓–✓$350M Series E (Sep 2026)
micro1Data major offering evaluations and RL environments through Realm✓––✓–✓$100M+ at $4B reported (Sep 2026), unconfirmed
TolokaData major with managed, harness-agnostic RL gyms✓✓✓✓––$72M (May 2025, Bezos Expeditions)
InvisibleData major building expert-verified RL environments from real workflows✓––––✓$100M raise (Sep 2025)
LabelboxData major offering RL gyms and simulated enterprise apps (Horizon, WorldSim)✓✓✓✓––$100M+ Series E incl. credit facility (Oct 2026)
OpenEnvOpen-source framework and catalog for agentic RL environments✓✓–✓–✓Not disclosed
BenchFlowOpen-source environment lab with an Apache-2.0 runtime and benchmarks✓–✓––✓Not disclosed

Want us to suggest three?

Tell us what you need to train. We read every request and reply within one business day with up to three vendors that fit, and why.

  • ✓ Free for labs
  • ✓ At least one non-advertiser
  • ✓ Confidential requests stay confidential
Add details (optional)

Common questions

What is an RL environment?

A sandbox where a model attempts tasks and gets a reward: the task, the state of the world (a codebase, a website, an app), the tools the agent can use, and a verifier that checks whether the task was done. Labs run millions of attempts in them to train agents with reinforcement learning.

How much do RL environments cost?

Epoch AI reported in January 2026 that tasks typically sell for $200 to $2,000 each, that contracts often run to six or seven figures per quarter, and that exclusive environments cost about four to five times more. Our pricing guide has the details and sources.

Who buys RL environments?

Frontier labs and newer "neolabs" training agents, plus some enterprises fine-tuning models for their own workflows. Most contracts are private, and no lab has publicly confirmed which vendors it buys from.

Should we build environments in-house or buy them?

Labs do both. Buying makes sense for breadth, app replicas and expert domains; building in-house makes sense for core capabilities you want to own. Our evaluation guide lists what to check before you buy.

Are there open-source RL environments?

Yes. Hubs and libraries such as Prime Intellect's Environments Hub, OpenEnv, Gymnasium, SWE-Gym, BrowserGym and OSWorld are public. Our open-source guide compares them.

Who pays for this site?

Vendors can buy clearly labeled sponsored listings at a flat monthly price. That never changes our picks or tables, and we take no commission on contracts.